<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!-- generator="wordpress/2.1" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>mattriffle(.com)</title>
	<link>http://www.mattriffle.com</link>
	<description>A bit about this, a little about that, a lot about nothing.</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 16 May 2007 03:07:38 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.1</generator>
	<language>en</language>
			<item>
		<title>Spider-Man 3</title>
		<link>http://www.mattriffle.com/2007/05/15/spider-man-3/</link>
		<comments>http://www.mattriffle.com/2007/05/15/spider-man-3/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 May 2007 03:06:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Matt</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Movies]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mattriffle.com/2007/05/15/spider-man-3/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ A good movie.  Very good.   Not great.   Not the best in the series.
Actually, if I were to rank the three movies, it&#8217;d be: 2, 1, 3.  (And that&#8217;s not a Snoop Dogg homage, either.)
Coming in behind the first movie is not a good sign, really.  First Superhero [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> A good movie.  Very good.   Not great.   Not the best in the series.</p>
<p>Actually, if I were to rank the three movies, it&#8217;d be: 2, 1, 3.  (And that&#8217;s not a <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/213_%28band%29">Snoop Dogg</a> homage, either.)</p>
<p>Coming in behind the first movie is not a good sign, really.  First Superhero movies have the burden of telling the origin story of the character.  February&#8217;s Ghost Rider was 3/4 origin &#8212; they had to make it really loud when Ghost Rider finally showed up, presumably to wake the audience.  But, I digress . . .</p>
<p> <a href="http://www.mattriffle.com/2007/05/15/spider-man-3/#more-6" class="more-link">(more&#8230;)</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.mattriffle.com/2007/05/15/spider-man-3/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>20 Miles And Running . . .</title>
		<link>http://www.mattriffle.com/2007/05/07/20-miles-and-running/</link>
		<comments>http://www.mattriffle.com/2007/05/07/20-miles-and-running/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 May 2007 13:39:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Matt</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Running]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mattriffle.com/2007/05/07/20-miles-and-running/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ran 20 miles yesterday &#8212; about 1.4 more than my previous best (which was a competitive 30K).  Sprinted the last quarter-mile or so to the finish, and felt good doing so.
Jenn asked if I could&#8217;ve run the last 6.2 if I had to then and there.  And I think the answer is &#8220;if it were [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ran 20 miles yesterday &#8212; about 1.4 more than my previous best (which was a competitive 30K).  Sprinted the last quarter-mile or so to the finish, and felt good doing so.</p>
<p>Jenn asked if I could&#8217;ve run the last 6.2 if I had to then and there.  And I <em>think </em>the answer is &#8220;if it were a competitive race, yes.&#8221;  Races are a lot different than running by yourself (and it <em>is</em> by yourself, even with a bunch of other people at North Park).</p>
<p>My biggest problem expanding my distance has been wrapping my head around the idea that to run farther, you have to run slower.  Doing the 5-mile loop in about 57 minutes is hard when I know I can do two of them at just under 50 minutes each.  But when you&#8217;re doing 4 loops, slowing down is the difference between finishing back at the car, or blacking out and waking up down the road at UPMC Passavant.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.mattriffle.com/2007/05/07/20-miles-and-running/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Riz MC - The Post 9/11 Blues</title>
		<link>http://www.mattriffle.com/2007/03/03/riz-mc-post-911-blues/</link>
		<comments>http://www.mattriffle.com/2007/03/03/riz-mc-post-911-blues/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Mar 2007 04:24:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Matt</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Music]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mattriffle.com/2007/03/03/riz-mc-post-911-blues/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I found this song on iTunes quite by accident &#8212; after an upgrade it stuck me in the British iTunes store, and it happened to be on the front of that site.  It&#8217;d probably make more sense if I were British, but trust me it&#8217;s worth the 99 cents.
&#8220;Sing a song, sing along:
Bush and [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I found this song on iTunes quite by accident &#8212; after an upgrade it stuck me in the British iTunes store, and it happened to be on the front of that site.  It&#8217;d probably make more sense if I were British, but trust me it&#8217;s worth the 99 cents.</p>
<p>&#8220;Sing a song, sing along:<br />
Bush and Blair in a tree,<br />
K-I-L-L-I-N-G.&#8221;</p>
<p>But don&#8217;t take my word for it.  If you have iTunes, you can listen to the 30-second snippet by clicking the link below:<br />
<a href="http://phobos.apple.com/WebObjects/MZStore.woa/wa/viewAlbum?playlistId=171767072&amp;s=143441&amp;i=171767088">Riz MC - The Post 9/11 Blues</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.mattriffle.com/2007/03/03/riz-mc-post-911-blues/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Tagalongs - A Public Service Announcement</title>
		<link>http://www.mattriffle.com/2007/03/01/tagalongs-a-public-service-announcement/</link>
		<comments>http://www.mattriffle.com/2007/03/01/tagalongs-a-public-service-announcement/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Mar 2007 15:45:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Matt</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Misc]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mattriffle.com/2007/03/01/tagalongs-a-public-service-announcement/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There are 75 calories in one (Girl Scout) Tagalong cookie.  75.
That is all.
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There are 75 calories in one (Girl Scout) Tagalong cookie.  <em><strong>75.</strong></em></p>
<p>That is all.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.mattriffle.com/2007/03/01/tagalongs-a-public-service-announcement/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
